Joint Chiefs Decided It's Important To State Their Position On Bringing "Murderous Animals" Here From Guantanamo

   Killers. Murderous animals. No better than that. It sounds more appropriate than "Terrorist", which implies some tenuous but somehow real link to validity through murder of innocents. Maybe it would be beneficial if we called them "murderous animals".
   The JCS got it right. Charlestonians I talk to do not want Gitmo's "murderous animals" here in our brig. Our brig is not a high security facility. It is located within a high density residential area. It's a stupid idea. We should appreciate the JCS taking the time to clarify their position that since there is a law against spending any money to move the "murderous animals" here or to build or improve any present facility to contain these "murderous animals".  Lt. General William Mayville Jr., Director of the JCS, said this in a letter to Congress recently. So...Thank you, JCS. And Thank you, Lt. General Mayville.  It looks to me like this pronouncement probably places your job security at risk because it suggests that the JCS intends to resist any attempt by our President to use his executive authority to bring the "murderous animals" here. Sir, it is nice to see someone in Government still has courage and common sense.  Jim Self